 |
|
Vote in our Current PollDo you already know how you would vote in the US 2012 presidential election if you could vote? Yes, I would always vote for my political party of choice. 0% Yes, because the current President would be my choice no matter what. 20% No. I'm not tied to any political party and there's plenty of time for actions on issues to change my mind. 40% No. It depends on the Republican candidate chosen. 40% Other (comment below) 0% Total votes: 5 Open Polls |
Karl Rove quits: The incredible shrinking White House
Submitted by newscaster on Mon, 08/13/2007 - 13:31.
IN A new blow to an increasingly isolated White House, Karl Rove has announced his retirement. Mr Rove, George Bush’s closest political adviser and the man credited with producing an emphatic string of Republican election victories, told the Wall Street Journal, in an interview published on Monday August 13th, that he would step down from his job as deputy chief of staff at the end of this month. Mr Rove said that he first considered quitting a year ago and that he planned to spend more time with his family. Joshua Bolten, the chief of staff, had apparently told White House employees that anyone who planned to leave before the end of Mr Bush’s term in January 2009 should do so before Labour Day this year, on September 3rd. Mr Rove may have outlived his usefulness to the White House. But his past has been remarkable. The tale of how Mr Rove made his mark as a political strategist in Texas during the 1980s, teaming up with Mr Bush to campaign for the governorship in 1994 (Mr Rove had advised Mr Bush in his unsuccessful run for a congressional seat in 1978), is now a familiar one. Earning the sobriquet “turd blossom” Mr Rove, as the story goes, provided the strategic thinking behind the genial front of Mr Bush. Together the pair went about trying to construct a sustainable Republican majority using the energy provided by a base of conservative activists. Mr Rove’s greatest triumph was probably in helping to get Mr Bush re-elected in 2004. The Republicans also increased their majority in Congress that year, going against the historic trend of losses for the party of a sitting president. But since then Mr Rove’s star has been on the wane. By the time it became clear that the Republicans were going to receive a drubbing in last year’s mid-term congressional elections, Mr Rove’s influence had anyway declined. The Valerie Plame affair badly damaged Mr Rove. He had to testify several times before a grand jury investigating the leaking of Ms Plame’s name, as a CIA officer, after her husband had criticised the White House’s handling of intelligence in the months before the Iraq war. Conservatives railed against the investigation, and Mr Rove was never charged in the case, but it wore away at his credibility. Along with other administration officials he also refused to testify before Congress on the sacking, last year, of nine federal prosecutors. His leaving fortifies the impression that Mr Bush and Dick Cheney, the vice-president, are the last men standing from a group of leaders that came to power in the 2000 election. In domestic affairs Mr Bush is unlikely to achieve much in his remaining months: there are no big initiatives on the table. It is telling that Mr Rove was, for a time, the man responsible in the White House for the immigration bill, which went down in flames in the Senate at the end of June. Mr Rove saw the bill as a way to attract Latino voters to the Republican electoral machine. Its failure made it that much harder to build a winning Republican majority for the election in 2008. Mr Rove’s absence may be felt keenly in the coming month or so. As General David Petraeus reports on the effectiveness of the troop “surge” in Iraq, next month, a political fight is likely to break out between Democrats (and quite a few Republicans) who want to withdraw American soldiers and the administration which insists on “staying the course.” As the debate gets going, Mr Bush and the Republicans will surely miss Mr Rove, who was quick to seek partisan advantage by tarnishing Democrats’ reputation on security. This injected added acrimony into American politics, such as when in June 2005 Mr Rove accused the Democrats of being fainthearted in their response to terrorist attacks on September 11th 2001. Aug 13th 2007 ************************************************************************ http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSELK33974620070813?src=081307_... *LINKS TO SEE ARTICLES pertaining to the controversy involving Gonzales, the leak of classified information about CIA officer Valerie Plame, and Rove’s political strategy Republicans block Bush ally vote Leahy Intends to Subpoena Bush Officials FBI abused power to get private records: report Judge Told Leak Was Part of 'Policy Dispute' U.S. debate over troop withdrawal seen to deepen *QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION Do you think that there are other motivations behind Karl Rove’s resignation besides wanting to spend more time with his family (his kids are in college now)? Do you think that anybody in the Bush administration encouraged Rove to resign? Do you think that Rove’s resigned to help Republicans in the 2008 election – since he had become such a controversial figure? Do you think that Rove should have resigned surrounding his alleged involvement in the leaking of top secret information about CIA agent Valerie Plame and the firing of federal prosecutors for political reasons? Source: |
User loginCurrent Headlines
Who's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 87 guests online.
|